A Practical Derivation of the Uncertainty Factor Applied to Adjust the Extractables/Leachables Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET) for Response Factor Variation.

The analytical evaluation threshold (AET) establishes which chromatographic peaks, produced during organic extractables/leachables (E&L) screening, require toxicological safety risk assessment because the peaks are associated with compounds of potentially unacceptable toxicity. Thus, the AET protects patient safety as its proper application ensures that all potentially unsafe E&L are necessarily assessed. Generally, application of the AET involves the presumption that all organic E&L have the same detector response factor, an assumption that is not valid for any of the detection methods commonly used in E&L screening. Thus, the AET's ability to be protective is compromised for poorly responding compounds, as they will appear to be below the AET when in fact they are not. This unacceptable outcome is addressed by adjusting the AET with an uncertainty factor (UF) whose value is dictated by the magnitude of response factor variation, with a larger variation resulting in a larger UF and a lower adjusted AET. Although the concept of the UF is straightforward, setting a generally accepted, scientifically valid, and practical value for the UF has been challenging. In this article, a database of relative response factors obtained for nearly 1200 E&L via the most commonly applied chromatographic screening methods (gas chromatography/mass spectrometry [GC/MS], liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization [LC/MS-APCI], and LC/MS with electrospray ionization [LC/MS-ESI]) is used to justify UFs for these methods, individually and as a combined practice, based on the practical principle of "the point of diminishing returns". Using this concept results in nearly 92% of the compounds in the database being properly flagged as above an AET adjusted with a UF = 3. Ninety-five percent (95%) coverage of the compounds can be achieved when a UF of 4 is applied to the combination of GC/MS and LC/MS methods or with other combinations of UF values applied to the various methods individually. Coverage is increased to 97% when a UF of 4 is individually applied to the GC/MS method and a UF of 10 is individually applied to the LC/MS methods. Furthermore, the available data suggest that application of both APCI and ESI ionization in LC/MS screening (as opposed to either method separately) provides the greatest coverage of E&L.

Is Retention Time and/or Structure Matching a Solution to the Challenge of Providing Quantitative Data When Screening for Extractables and Leachables by GC/MS?

Leachables can potentially and adversely affect patient safety. Thus, drug products and medical devices are chromatographically screened for organic leachables (and extractables), establishing these compounds' identity and quantity. Accurate quantitation of extractables and leachables is challenging given compound-to-compound variation in response factors. One proposed means for managing variation and improving quantitation accuracy is the use of retention time (RT) and structure to match analytes with their most relevant quantitation surrogate. Although the scientific basis for relationships between RT and structure versus response is unclear, the use of matching was investigated using databases of response factors (RFs) or relative response factors (RRFs), RTs, and structures for extractables/leachables. Gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (MS) detection was investigated as response variation in this technique is less than with other screening methods such as liquid chromatography with MS detection. The overall RF variation across RT and structure makes it difficult to establish whether RT and response or structure and response can be correlated. Rigorous statistical analysis of the data concludes that there are no discernible relationships between these quantities; however, casual visual examination suggests that subtle relationships might exist. The effect that RT or structure matching could have on quantitation accuracy was considered, presuming that the visual trends were real. Under this presumption, it was estimated that RT matching could at most improve quantitation accuracy by 25%, and that structure matching could improve accuracy by at most 50%. However, these improvements do not address the response variation that is independent of RT or structure, and thus it is concluded that RT or structure matching are not viable solutions to RF variation. Rather, it is recommended that databases of authentic RRFs be aggressively populated to provide accurate quantitation. Compounds for which authentic RRFs cannot be secured are most effectively quantified using the median RRF.

Identifying and Mitigating Errors in Screening for Organic Extractables and Leachables: Part 2-Errors of Inexact Identification and Inaccurate Quantitation.

Patients can be exposed to leachables derived from pharmaceutical manufacturing systems, packages, and/or medical devices during a clinical therapy. These leachables can adversely decrease the therapy's effectiveness and/or adversely impact patient safety. Thus, extracts or drug products are chromatographically screened to discover, identify, and quantify organic extractables or leachables. Although screening methods have achieved a high degree of technical and practical sophistication, they are not without issues in terms of accomplishing these three functions. In this Part 2 of our three-part series, errors of inexact identification and inaccurate quantitation are addressed. An error of inexact identification occurs when a screening method fails to produce an analyte response that can be used to secure the analyte's identity. The error may be that the response contains insufficient information to interpret, in which case the analyte cannot be identified or that the interpretation of the response produces an incorrect identity. In either case, proper use of an internal extractables and leachables database can decrease the frequency of encountering unidentifiable analytes and increase the confidence that identities that are secured are correct. Cases of identification errors are provided, illustrating the use of multidimensional analysis to increase confidence in procured identities. An error of inaccurate quantitation occurs when an analyte's concentration is estimated by correlating the responses of the analyte and an internal standard and arises because of response differences between analytes and internal standards. The use of a database containing relative response factors or relative response functions to secure more accurate analyte quantities is discussed and demonstrated.

Identifying and Mitigating Errors in Screening for Organic Extractables and Leachables: Part 1-Introduction to Errors in Chromatographic Screening for Organic Extractables and Leachables and Discussion of the Errors of Omission.

Substances leached from materials used in pharmaceutical manufacturing systems, packages, and/or medical devices can be administered to a patient as part of a clinical therapy. These leachables can have an undesirable effect on the effectiveness of the therapy and/or patient safety. Thus, relevant samples such as material extracts or drug products are chromatographically screened for foreign organic impurities, where screening is the analytical process of discovering, identifying, and quantifying these unspecified foreign impurities. Although screening methods for organic extractables and leachables have achieved a high degree of technical and practical sophistication, they are not without issues with respect to their ability to accomplish the aforementioned three functions. In this first part of a series of three manuscripts, the process of screening is examined, limitations in screening are identified, and the concept of using an internally developed analytical database to identify, mitigate, or correct these errors is introduced. Furthermore, errors of omission are described, where an error of omission occurs when a screening method fails to produce a recognizable response to an analyte present in the test sample. The error may be that no response is produced ("falling through the cracks") or that a produced response is not recognizable ("failing to see the tree for the forest"). In either case, proper use of a robust internal extractables/leachables database can decrease the frequency with which errors of omission occur. Examples of omission errors, their causes, and their possible resolution are discussed.

Influence of reducing carbohydrates on (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid degradation during thermal treatments.

The mechanism and kinetics of the degradation of (6S)5-methyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolic acid in an aqueous solution in the presence of reducing carbohydrates such as glucose and fructose were investigated for thermal treatments. Preliminary experiments indicated that the presence of reducing carbohydrates, especially fructose (1.6 mM-1.5 M), strongly enhanced folate degradation at moderate temperatures (50-90 degrees C, 0-60 min). Identification of the predominant folate degradation products by LC-MS and NMR pointed to the formation of N(2alpha)-[1-(carboxyethyl)]-5-methyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolic acid diastereomers besides other folate degradation products upon prolonged heating (24 h, 100 degrees C) of (6S)5-methyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolic acid in fructose or dihydroxyacetone solutions. Using a Bayesian multiresponse kinetic modeling approach, kinetic characterization and elucidation of the degradation mechanism in the presence of equimolar amounts of dihydroxyacetone, fructose, and glucose were achieved. On the basis of the established degradation mechanism for (6S)5-methyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolic acid oxidation in the literature, it was shown that nonenzymatic glycation occurred due to reaction of dihydroxyacetone with 5-methyl-7,8-dihydrofolic acid. During thermal treatments (85-110 degrees C, 0-60 min), the nonenzymatic glycation reaction was characterized by an activation energy of 61.3 +/- 9.3 and 77.6 +/- 7.8 kJ mol(-1) in the presence of, respectively, dihydroxyacetone and fructose. Addition of L-ascorbic acid (1.13 mM) to folate samples (0.04 mM) with equimolar amounts of fructose prior to heating (100 degrees C, 0-45 min) was shown to retard the formation of 5-methyl-7,8-dihydrofolic acid and hence prevented the formation of the carboxyethylated derivatives under the investigated conditions.

Influence of thermal processing on hydrolysis and stability of folate poly-gamma-glutamates in broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica), carrot (Daucus carota) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum).

The folate poly-gamma-glutamate profile, their concentrations, and hydrolysis by endogenous gamma-glutamyl hydrolase (GGH) were evaluated in broccoli, carrot and tomato. Further studies on the effect of time and temperature on folate poly-gamma-glutamate hydrolysis and stability were carried out in broccoli since this vegetable showed the highest long-chain and total folate poly-gamma-glutamate concentration. The evolution of l-ascorbic acid, total phenols and Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) values was evaluated in parallel. Upon thermal inactivation of GGH prior to crushing, it was observed that broccoli, carrot and tomato contained poly-gamma-glutamates with one to seven glutamate residues but differed in the predominant poly-gamma-glutamates. Crushing of raw broccoli, carrot and tomato resulted in significant poly-gamma-glutamate profile changes in broccoli and carrot (indicating GGH-catalyzed hydrolysis) but not in tomato. In this study, the actual crushing of raw broccoli matrix had a greater effect on folate poly-gamma-glutamate hydrolysis than incubation conditions (0-30 min at 25-55 degrees C). During treatments at 25-140 degrees C, folate retention was higher at 80 and 100 degrees C than at the other temperatures. A similar trend in thermal stability was observed for folates, vitamin C, total phenols and TEAC value, an indication that conditions that result in endogenous antioxidants degradation might also result in folate degradation.

Size exclusion chromatography to gain insight into the complex formation of carrot pectin methylesterase and its inhibitor from kiwi fruit as influenced by thermal and high-pressure processing.

A size exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) method was implemented to study complex formation between carrot pectin methylesterase (PME) and its inhibitor (PMEI) from kiwi fruit in the context of traditional thermal and novel high-pressure processing. Evidence was gained that both thermal and high-pressure treatments of PME give rise to two distinct enzyme subpopulations: a catalytically active population, eluting from the size exclusion column, and an inactive population, aggregated and excluded from the column. When mixing a partly denatured PME sample with a fixed amount of PMEI, a PME-PMEI complex peak was observed on HPSEC, of which the peak area was highly correlated with the residual enzyme activity of the corresponding PME sample. This observation indicates complex formation to be restricted to the active PME fraction. When an equimolar mixture of PME and PMEI was subjected to either a thermal or a high-pressure treatment, marked differences were observed. At elevated temperature, enzyme and inhibitor remained united and aggregated as a whole, thus gradually disappearing from the elution profile. Conversely, elevated pressure caused the dissociation of the PME-PMEI complexes, followed by a separate action of pressure on enzyme and inhibitor. Remarkably, PMEI appeared to be pressure-resistant when compressed at acidic pH (ca. 4).

Mechanism and related kinetics of 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid degradation during combined high hydrostatic pressure-thermal treatments.

The mechanism and kinetics of the degradation of 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid during thermal and combined high pressure-thermal treatments in an aqueous solution were investigated. In a first approach the degradation was described by a first-order kinetic model using single-response modeling, and the combined pressure-temperature dependence of the resulting degradation rate constants was empirically described. To obtain a mechanistic insight, degradation products were purified and identified by LC-MS and NMR. Quantification of an s-triazine derivative, 5-methyldihydrofolic acid, and p-aminobenzoyl-l-glutamate as predominant degradation products at atmospheric pressure resulted in elucidation and kinetic characterization of the folate degradation mechanism by Bayesian multiresponse modeling. The postulated mechanism was evaluated at elevated hydrostatic pressure. On the basis of the pressure and temperature dependence of the reaction rates, some degradation reactions were either accelerated or decelerated upon application of pressure. Multiresponse kinetics can be a valuable tool to assess the impact of high hydrostatic pressure and other processing techniques on nutrients, and incorporating mechanistic insights can advance the current kinetic approach for process optimization.

Implications of beta-mercaptoethanol in relation to folate stability and to determination of folate degradation kinetics during processing: a case study on [6S]-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid.

The effect of beta-mercaptoethanol (0-2%) addition to thermally and/or pressure-treated samples on [6S]-5-methyltetrahydrofolate was studied. Degradation of [6S]-5-methyltetrahydrofolate during both thermal and pressure treatments was mainly caused by oxidation, and the oxidized folates could be partly/completely reduced by beta-mercaptoethanol. The addition of beta-mercaptoethanol (2%) to the thermally and pressure-treated samples overestimated the "actual" stability of [6S]-5-methyltetrahydrofolate and misled the obtained kinetic information.